I recently found this email from about a year ago buried in an account I no longer log into. Apparently, I had sent this note to myself in a stupor fueled by a monster migraine that I self medicated. No, this is not a regular occurrence. So...here is the actual text of the "note to self" that I sent a year or more ago...and I actually had some pretty good thought patterns at the time...
"This is going to be interesting. Iam in an
altered brain state writing this. I had the headache from hades earlier that
persisted through lowly devices, like tylenol and forehead tapping and pushing.
Damn, still there. Concluded the event was worthy of a lortab from my
slendering supply. Also, figured an ambien was useful too, as lortab usually
makes me wide awake. I haven't seen Golum this time, maybe I won't. He is nice
enough.
So, essentially I wanted to walk up a few steps, seee if I got a good view from
my parking spot. Look ay whats going on with other people. I've never
understood weapons collectors. So crazy. Always a family. Ultimate peer pressure
there. My family has many diverse interests. We each pursue them alone. So, the
official approach is rathet lonely but less distracting
So, in concussion drugs arent really bad. It's alll in how you use then
and what you do with them. you can be magical!!!!!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone"
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Monday, April 29, 2013
Defining Art
Art is subjective, in its many forms, whether it be
painting, sculpture, drawing, dance, theatre, writing, or any other form of
creative expression. Therefore narrowing
down a specific definition is just as subjective, but I am going to refer to an article entitled “A Naturalist
Definition of Art” by Denis Dutton that appeared in the summer 2006 issue of The
Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
In the article he says “characteristic features found cross-culturally
can be reduced to a list of core items”.
He went on to describe twelve key items, or characteristic features,
that should be present within the questioned work for it to be considered a
work of art. These characteristic
features are summarized here:
·
Direct Pleasure – the work should be a
source of immediate, experimental pleasure for the viewer.
·
Skill or Virtuosity – specialized skills
were required or necessary to create the work.
·
Style – a recognizable style can be
easily discerned that sets the work apart from similar works.
·
Novelty and Creativity – the work stands
alone as a unique creation or idea even if based on existing ideas or similar
creations.
·
Criticism – critique of the work should
be elaborate and detailed, the critique is
required to compare and contrast the work against similar works in a
sophisticated fashion.
·
Representation – a clear, concise idea
is represented.
·
“Special” focus – the work should seem
“bracketed off” from the ordinary, and will demand unique attention.
·
Expressive Individuality – the work
should reflect and be representative of its creator’s unique style and
discernible as such.
·
Emotional Saturation – the work should
invoke varying degrees of emotion to the viewer.
·
Intellectual Challenge – the work should
present a mystery or puzzle to draw in the viewer.
·
Art Traditions and Institutions – the
work should be recognized as having value by institutions such as museums,
galleries, and the artist’s peers.
·
Imaginative Experience – the work should
stand as a “presentation” of the imagination of the viewer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

